Feasibility and Acceptability of an Online Family Literacy Program in an Under-Resourced Community During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to examine the feasibility and acceptability of an online family literacy program (FLP) among low-income Latino families during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: We conducted a mixed methods pilot study. Latino parent-child dyads participated in an 8-week online FLP conducted on video conferencing software, developed through a cross-sector health care-education partnership. We conducted surveys and structured observation to assess feasibility and acceptability and in-depth interviews to gain insight into the context of participants' experiences during the pandemic. RESULTS: The 35 participating parent-child dyads all identified as Latino, 83% reported limited English proficiency, and 60% of parents did not achieve a high school diploma. Nearly two-thirds of families participated in at least half of the sessions. On average, parents welcomed, liked, approved, and found the program appealing. While 86% experienced a technology problem at least once during sessions, all were resolved with minimal assistance. During qualitative interviews, we identified 3 themes that provide insight into their experiences with the FLP within the broader context of the pandemic: (1) disruption in family routine and financial strain caused by COVID-19 intensified family stress, (2) the forced transition to remote learning highlighted the inequities experienced by Latino preschool children, and (3) the FLP empowered parents and enhanced health and education experiences. CONCLUSION: Latino families had high participation levels in an online FLP and found it acceptable. Additional work is needed to understand how similar primary care programs can be leveraged to promote optimal development during a time of heightened need.

(In)frequently asked questions: On types of frequency and their role(s) in heritage language variability.

In recent years, researchers have become increasingly interested in exploring frequency as a source of variability in heritage speakers' (HSs) knowledge of their heritage language (HL). While many of these studies acknowledge that frequency can affect the shape of HL grammars, there is still no clear consensus about (a) what "frequency" means in the context of HL acquisition and (b) how to operationalize its multiple subtypes. In this paper, we provide a critical overview of frequency effects in HL research and their relevance for understanding patterns of inter/intra-speaker variability. To do so, we outline how prior research has defined, measured, and tested frequency, and present-as well as evaluate-novel methodological approaches and innovations recently implemented in the study of frequency effects, including a new analysis of how self-reported lexical frequency reliably predicts HSs' production of subjunctive mood in Spanish. Our aim is to highlight the immense potential of such work for addressing long-standing questions about HL grammars and to propose new lines of inquiry that will open up additional pathways for understanding HL variability.